xemacs vs emacs

Stephen J. Turnbull stephen at xemacs.org
Sun Apr 13 19:03:40 EDT 2008


David Kastrup writes:

 > I don't get your point.  Windows is not free software either and Emacs
 > runs on it just fine.

David Reitter explains it here:

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-03/msg00785.html

and Stefan Monnier confirmed that David's reasoning conforms to Emacs
policy in a private conversation later.




More information about the XEmacs-Beta mailing list