Why no __attribute__ ((unused)) for g++?
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Sun Jun 3 20:37:41 EDT 2007
Jerry James writes:
> We could try removing the "&& !defined(__cplusplus)" part and see
> if anybody complains.
> checked version 8. If __INTEL_COMPILER is defined, then the check
> should be __INTEL_COMPILER >= 800 or >= 900, depending. Does anybody
> have a version 8 installed?
I'll try >= 800 on the same principle as above.
Thanks to the enlightment!
More information about the XEmacs-Beta