Memory corruption errors!?
jan at rychter.com
Wed Mar 22 12:00:32 EST 2006
> >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Rychter <jan at rychter.com> writes:
> Jan> I did not realize that --enable-newgc is completely
> Jan> independent from --enable-kkcc. If there is an intention of
> Jan> keeping the old code around, perhaps better descriptions
> Jan> should be provided in configure? (as in --with-gc=vanilla
> Jan> for folks who want to go back to a working default)
> There is no guarantee of a working default in the beta series.
> The only way to get something close to a guarantee is a feature
> freeze. We're not ready for that.
I was just making a suggestion that would make life easier for some
people. Yes, I know it's a beta, yes, I know there are no guarantees.
I wasn't complaining, as you might have noticed, just suggesting.
Does the Beta-ness of the beta series mean we should not aim for
well-documented config options?
More information about the XEmacs-Beta