[Bug: 21.4.18] site-lisp not in load-path
rsparapa at mcw.edu
Wed Jan 18 16:01:38 EST 2006
Michael Sperber wrote:
>>For packages built entirely by third parties, the following transition
>>strategy is easy to implement and essentially riskless but was vetoed
>>at the brainstorm stage by Mike (and I think Ben) several years ago
>>(and ignored by everybody else).
>I don't remember ever having seen it. I'm not exactly falling in love
>with it at first sight, but I don't see any reason for vetoing it
>Could you summarize what problem you're trying to solve here? I'm a
Who are you asking that to? Are you wondering about the original bug report
or Stephen's post?
More information about the XEmacs-Beta