Speed difference in Gnus
ben at xemacs.org
Fri Oct 14 08:12:25 EDT 2005
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
>The problem is that people who tried it claim that XEmacs 21.5 is much
>*slower* than 21.4, especially for Gnus. That's why I was reluctant
>to even include it in the comparison.
maybe they're comparing apples and oranges, i.e. error-checking and
no-error-checking. i'd be rather surprised if xemacs 21.5 actually got
slower, and i'd certainly like to know why.
More information about the XEmacs-Beta