Structure of package /man
galibert at pobox.com
Wed Jun 8 14:53:55 EDT 2005
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 07:29:24PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Look, why do you think that all RPM and deb and similar stuff get
> distributed both as binary and source package, where every purchaser
> of the binary has the right to get the source for not more than
> copying fees?
Binary rpms and debs do not include the source files. So "accompany"
meaning "in the same package" is out. At that point, everything's
In particular, I fail to see any legally significant difference
between saying that the source for
and that the source for
More information about the XEmacs-Beta