21.4.13: ^c in shell now works, but now shell output only shows up when cursor moves
Karr, David
david.karr at wamu.net
Fri Dec 16 17:48:10 EST 2005
I have "process-connection-type" set to t in both 21.4.13 and 21.4.18.
In 21.4.18, the output is not blocky, but it is in 21.4.13. What's
curious is that in 21.4.13, when I first run my test case of running an
app from the shell prompt, the first run comes out fine. Each time
after that, however, I only see a block of output when I move the
cursor.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glynn Clements [mailto:glynn at gclements.plus.com]
>
> Karr, David wrote:
>
> > No, I'm not compiling them, I just download with the installer. In
> > testing 21.4.18 installed on the same box, I see that the "blocky
> > output" does NOT occur (and ^c^c still works).
> >
> > Would this have something to do with "process-connection-type"?
>
> As Ben says, quite likely. If it's set to nil, processes will
> use pipes unless something explicitly binds it to t.
>
> One consequence of using pipes is that stdout will normally
> be block-buffered by default, whereas it will be
> line-buffered if it is associated with a terminal.
>
> Another consequence is that Ctrl-C, Ctrl-Z etc don't work with pipes.
>
> Also, some programs explicitly modify their behaviour if
> stdin/stdout correspond to a terminal (e.g. only displaying
> prompts for a terminal).
>
> It isn't really clear (to me) how process-connection-type is
> meant to be used. Obviously, if a particular process really
> needs a specific setting, then the caller should bind it
> appropriately.
>
> But how it should be set globally, or when the global setting
> should be honoured, isn't clear. E.g. should "shell" be
> explicitly binding it to t, or using the global setting? It
> seems unlikely that you would actually want to use pipes for
> an interactive shell.
>
> --
> Glynn Clements <glynn at gclements.plus.com>
>
More information about the XEmacs-Beta
mailing list