Auctex pkg: summary and state of art
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Mon Sep 6 21:21:20 EDT 2004
>>>>> "Uwe" == Uwe Brauer <oub at mat.ucm.es> writes:
Uwe> Note please that I write $prefix/xemacs-packages and not
Uwe> $prefix/lib. The former is chosen in my Debian installation.
For making the package itself, it doesn't matter. The package is
created relative to xemacs-packages, and should be untarred with cwd =
.../xemacs-packages. Is this (absolute) directory referred to from
inside AUCTeX? If so, in XEmacs it should be changed to a form based
on `locate-data-directory', as you have in (6).
Also, $prefix refers to /usr/local by (XEmacs) default, and usually to
/usr, or something under /opt, in OS distros that package XEmacs. In
particular, in Debian it is /usr, while the packages are in
/usr/share/xemacs21/{xemacs,mule}-packages as far as I know. Is that
incorrect, or are we using different ideas of $prefix?
Uwe> (6) now the tex-site.el file has to be edited. Using
Uwe> Steve Y idea, we will have.
Uwe> (defvar TeX-lisp-directory
Uwe> (file-name-as-directory
Uwe> (expand-file-name "style" (locate-data-directory "auctex")))
Uwe> "*The directory where the AUCTeX lisp files are located.")
Uwe> (7) the *real* problem is the _variable_
Uwe> (defcustom TeX-macro-global
[...]
Uwe> I have no idea what to do here. This is the directory where
Uwe> part of the tex installation is located. It is machine
Uwe> dependent and has been found in this case by configure. This
Uwe> looks really wired anybody has an idea?
Find out what configure does. It's probably something based on
kpsewhich. In any case, tex-site should be able to do it at run-time,
at negligible cost.
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
More information about the XEmacs-Beta
mailing list