[PATCH] Revised parallel build support.
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Thu Nov 25 06:31:15 EST 2004
>>>>> "viteno" == Norbert Koch <viteno at xemacs.org> writes:
viteno> Malcolm Purvis <malcolmp at xemacs.org> writes:
>> Did you regenerate configure from configure.in?
viteno> Apparently not :-)
viteno> Now, the Makefile looks much better and the build
We should fix this; I really don't think it needs to be.
Proposal: Have a top-level initial Makefile that looks like
echo "If autoconf succeeded, you should now run configure."
echo "If it did not, you should complain to the developers for"
echo "not providing an up-to-date configure."
and add a similar stanza to Makefile.in.in, or maybe even something
helpful enough to do a ./config.status --recheck after autoconf.
What breaks? I mean, worse than what just happened to Norbert?
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
More information about the XEmacs-Beta