[WHL] Re: Question about usage of C-number and M-number

[Ben Wing]

Funny ...  My reason for making M-num be "paste" was exactly the same :)
M-2 and M-3 are easier for me.  Maybe this is a combination of my fucked-up
hands (pinky + anything is horrible) and the position of Ctrl in the
bottom-left corner; M-* is easy w/the thumb. [I want to see *all* shift keys
thumbable.]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen J. Turnbull [mailto:turnbull at sk.tsukuba.ac.jp] 
> On Behalf Of Stephen J. Turnbull
> Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 7:53 PM
> To: Ben Wing
> Cc: 'XEmacs Beta'
> Subject: [WHL] Re: Question about usage of C-number and M-number
> 
> 
> >>>>> "Ben" == Ben Wing <ben at 666.com> writes:
> 
>     Ben> Do people tend to use C-num or M-num for digit-argument?  I
>     Ben> can revise the keybindings so that either one remains, but
>     Ben> I'd like to know current usage.
> 
> I use C-digit; it's easier to type, especially for 2 and 3.
> 
> -- 
> Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences     
> http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
> University of Tsukuba                    Tennodai 1-1-1 
> Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
>                Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
>               ask what your business can "do for" free software.
>