Switching http://www.xemacs.org/cgi-bin/ to CVS controlled ~xemacweb/xemacsweb/cgi-bin/
Adrian.Aichner at t-online.de
Tue Jun 22 17:00:45 EDT 2004
Samuel S Chessman <chessman at tux.org> writes:
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Adrian Aichner wrote:
>> The code is ready for review at
> I've reviewed this and a couple questions are in order.
That was quick -- thanks Sam!
> Are you using namazu-2.0.10? I think 2.0.12 is current. This isn't a
> big issue.
Yeah, the guy who set it up left.
It seems to work well. I'll leave for later, but thanks for the
> Glimpse is way out of date. Current Glimpse is 4.18.0
> It looks like you're using glimpse version 3.6, 1996.
> ls -l /web/http-xemacs/bin/glimpse
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 xemacweb www 248068 Jun 17 1998 /web/http-xemacs/bin/glimpse*
> Perhaps that explains why glimpse runs away continually.
Does it? Can you explain a bit more?
Let me take the step to cvs-controlled xemacsweb/cgi-bin configuration
first, if that's OK with you.
Sam, could you please change the synlink
(xemacweb at gwyn) /archives/http-xemacs $ ls -l cgi-bin
ls -l cgi-bin
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 May 18 09:27 cgi-bin -> /web/http-xemacs/cgi-bin
(xemacweb at gwyn) /archives/http-xemacs $
to point to /web/http-xemacs/xemacsweb/cgi-bin
> I'm not sure what has changed but it is probably a good idea to update.
> See http://www.webglimpse.org/
OK, I've made a note of that.
Sam, another issue:
Back when I wrote
I was able to find matches over maultiple years for xemacs-beta.
Now the index only goes back to May 2004.
See for yourself:
Is there a chance will still have an intact index up to April or so?
I have no clue what could have cause the index loss between Jun 6 and
Jun 11 (when I noticed the missing matches), as documented in
Regenerating the index starting at 1998 would be a drag, I guess.
> Thanks for adding this to CVS, it's a lot clearer to me now what is
> going on with wilma, namazu, and glimpse.
mailto:adrian at xemacs.org
More information about the XEmacs-Beta