Bytecode stack manipulations for weak objects

[Steve Youngs]

* Jerry James <james at xemacs.org> writes:

  > Last fall 

Help me out here, Jerry, what does that mean?  I know that by "fall"
you really meant to say "autumn", but even that knowledge doesn't help
me.  I have absolutely no idea when your autumn is.  I couldn't even
tell you when _my_ autumn is.

Can you give me a date, or range of dates?  Something like: "somewhere
around Feb-Apr last year" would be cool.

  > there were a number of crashes induced by Gnus with a patch in
  > place

A patch, cool!  How about the URL to the patch submission on
xemacs-patches?  Or the bug report?

  > What is the status of that patch?  Was the problem completely
  > resolved, or do we just have a workaround in place?

From the Gnus side of things, until I can pinpoint what you are
talking about the answer is a definite I wouldn't have the foggiest.
What I will say is that it has been a _very_ long time since I have
seen a Gnus induced crash.

-- 
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
|        XEmacs - The only _______ you'll ever need.       |
|          Fill in the blank, yes, it's THAT good!         |
|----------------------------------<steve at youngs.au.com>---|
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://calypso.tux.org/pipermail/xemacs-beta/attachments/20040416/0953a871/attachment.bin