This is a packages patch, the Mercurial metadata are from a local repository and should be ignored. comparing with /Sources/packages-current-checked-out searching for changes changeset: 7:086e30f832e9 tag: tip user: Aidan Kehoe <kehoea(a)parhasard.net&gt; date: Sun Apr 20 13:16:55 2008 +0200 summary: Support specifying bases for #'sort-regexp-fields-numerically. diff -r 13601045291b -r 086e30f832e9 xemacs-packages/xemacs-base/ChangeLog --- a/xemacs-packages/xemacs-base/ChangeLog Fri Apr 11 20:47:07 2008 +0200 +++ b/xemacs-packages/xemacs-base/ChangeLog Sun Apr 20 13:16:55 2008 +0200 ＠＠ -1,3 +1,14 ＠＠ 2008-02-25 Norbert Koch <viteno＠xemacs +2008-04-20 Aidan Kehoe <kehoea(a)parhasard.net&gt; + + * sort.el (sort-regexp-fields-numerically): + Support `sort-numeric-base' in #'s-r-f-n, implement the same + sniffing of a number's base used in #'sort-numeric-fields, correct + and extend the docstring (`sort-fold-case' is not used, the + example has been changed to one where numeric sorting is + relevant. + (sort-numeric-base): + Document its use in #'s-r-f-n. + 2008-02-25 Norbert Koch <viteno(a)xemacs.org&gt; * Makefile (VERSION): XEmacs package 2.16 released. diff -r 13601045291b -r 086e30f832e9 xemacs-packages/xemacs-base/sort.el --- a/xemacs-packages/xemacs-base/sort.el Fri Apr 11 20:47:07 2008 +0200 +++ b/xemacs-packages/xemacs-base/sort.el Sun Apr 20 13:16:55 2008 +0200 ＠＠ -274,7 +274,7 ＠＠ the sort order." (setq sort-fields-syntax-table table))) (defcustom sort-numeric-base 10 - "*The default base used by `sort-numeric-fields'." + "*Fallback base for `sort-numeric-fields', `sort-regexp-fields-numerically'." :group 'sort :type 'integer) ＠＠ -500,21 +500,26 ＠＠ RECORD-REGEXP specifies the textual unit RECORD-REGEXP specifies the textual units which should be sorted. For example, to sort lines RECORD-REGEXP would be \"^.*$\" KEY specifies the part of each record (ie each match for RECORD-REGEXP) - is to be used for sorting. + which is to be used for sorting. If it is \"\\\\digit\" then the digit'th \"\\\\(...\\\\)\" match field from RECORD-REGEXP is used. If it is \"\\\\&\" then the whole record is used. Otherwise, it is a regular-expression for which to search within the record. If a match for KEY is not found within a record then that record is ignored. +If the match for KEY starts with \"0x\", it specifies hexadecimal as the +conversion base. A match for KEY starting with \"0\" is interpreted as +octal; otherwise `sort-numeric-base' is consulted for the conversion base to +use. You can avoid the automatic detection of a field's base by specifying +RECORD-REGEXP appropriately; \"0*\" before the start of the KEY will prevent +detection as octal, and including \"[^xX]\" in the group corresponding to +KEY will prevent detection as hex. + With a negative prefix arg sorts in reverse order. -The variable `sort-fold-case' determines whether alphabetic case affects -the sort order. - -For example: to sort lines in the region by the first word on each line - starting with the letter \"f\", - RECORD-REGEXP would be \"^.*$\" and KEY would be \"\\\\=\\<f\\\\w*\\\\>\"" +For example: to sort lines in the region by the numerical value of the first + C hexadecimal constant, + RECORD-REGEXP would be \"^.*$\" and KEY would be \"0[xX][0-9A-Fa-f]+\"" ;; using negative prefix arg to mean "reverse" is now inconsistent with ;; other sort-.*fields functions but then again this was before, since it ;; didn't use the magnitude of the arg to specify anything. ＠＠ -529,9 +534,27 ＠＠ For example: to sort lines in the region (read-string "Regexp specifying key within record: " nil 'sort-regexp-history) beg end))) - (sort-regexp-fields reverse record-regexp key-regexp beg end - #'(lambda (a b) - (< (string-to-number a) (string-to-number b))))) + (let ((base-sniff-regexp "\\(0[xX]\\)[0-9a-fA-F]\\|\\(0\\)[0-7]")) + (sort-regexp-fields reverse record-regexp key-regexp beg end + #'(lambda (a b) + ;; If I replace #'< with #'max, the warning + ;; + ;; ** variable base-sniff-regexp bound but not + ;; referenced + ;; + ;; goes away. Byte compiler bug. + (< (string-to-number a + (if (string-match base-sniff-regexp a) + (cond ((match-beginning 1) 16) + ((match-beginning 2) 8) + (t sort-numeric-base)) + sort-numeric-base)) + (string-to-number b + (if (string-match base-sniff-regexp b) + (cond ((match-beginning 1) 16) + ((match-beginning 2) 8) + (t sort-numeric-base)) + sort-numeric-base)))))))  (defvar sort-columns-subprocess t) -- ¿Dónde estará ahora mi sobrino Yoghurtu Nghé, que tuvo que huir precipitadamente de la aldea por culpa de la escasez de rinocerontes? _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Patches mailing list XEmacs-Patches(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-patches