Jerry James writes:
This is a resend. I sent the original on May 27, but haven't
seen it
show up in the archives. The sent mail is not HTML (I checked), so
maybe the patch was too large? I've compressed it this time, just in
case.
Too big shouldn't be a problem, it looks like I just threw out the
baby with the bathwater. A message from you on the right date does
show up in the incoming procmail log, but not in the outgoing resend
log. Very sorry! (... and volunteer moderators welcome ...)
- I could not apply Stephen's suggestion for character
replacements
to skk.texi. XEmacs 21.5 dealt with them just fine, but 21.4
choked on them. Is that because jisx0213 support is disabled in
mule-ucs?
It's a bug in mule-ucs. mule-ucs should handle characters it doesn't
know about (aside from those that are defined to be undefined). Maybe
enabling jisx0213 support would do the trick, but that's not obvious.
In any case, I used Aidan's REPLACEMENT CHARACTER suggestion
instead.
OK. I doubt anybody is learning SKK anymore; it's quite efficient if
you are willing to invest a lot in learning the tricks, but it takes a
lot of investment compared to modern input methods.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Patches mailing list
XEmacs-Patches(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-patches