Re: [Q] Re: Identify XEmacs build from Mercurial changeset
- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2024 -----
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2004 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2003 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
Marcus Crestani <crestani(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:
>>>>>"MS" == Michael Sperber
<sperber(a)deinprogramm.de> writes:
MS> * version.sh.in: Use Mercurial tip hash to identify version
MS> instead of old CVS method.
I'd prefer to not only have the tip hash as the version information
but also have the date of the last changeset. A date is more useful
than a hash value that I'd have to lookup first.
MS> + (cd ${srcdir}; hg identify | cut -d " " -f 1 >> version.sh);
\
This does the trick:
hg tip --template '{node|short} {date|isodate}\n'
The problem is that it doesn't tell us if the working copy was modified
relative to the working revision. I suspect when the information from
xemacs_extra_name become relevant, we'll have to look it up anyway.
--
Cheers =8-} M.
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Patches mailing list
XEmacs-Patches(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-patches
Saturday, 26 January
Sat, 26 Jan
8:57 p.m.
New subject: [Q] Re: Identify XEmacs build from Mercurial changeset
Michael Sperber writes:
Marcus Crestani <crestani(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:
> I'd prefer to not only have the tip hash as the version
information
> but also have the date of the last changeset. A date is more useful
> than a hash value that I'd have to lookup first.
I don't really see why. Yes it give you information immediately. But
it's not very precise. I think we should work on tools to extract
this kind of information efficiently in XEmacs. From the command
line, just use hg log -r <nodeid>.
But of course it may be a local branch, in which case date gives
strictly more information than a nodeid can. How useful that is, I
don't know.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Patches mailing list
XEmacs-Patches(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-patches
5928
days inactive
5928
days old
1 comments
2 participants
tags (0)
participants (2)
-
Michael Sperber -
Stephen J. Turnbull