Thanks, Mats.
These things happen to everyone.
Peer review is the key to excellent software and healthy software
projects. I regret not having done more review work myself while I
was an active XEmacs maintainer.
Martin
>>>> "M" == Mats Lidell <matsl(a)xemacs.org>
writes:
>>>> Martin wrote:
Martin> How is removal of the
comment heading above an improvement?
Martin> How is it related to xft?
M> This was a mistake. Don't know how on earth I managed to corrupt the
M> file that way. It was certainly not my intention. (And I should
M> definitely have caught it myself during inspection before showing it
M> to the world but I guess I got carried away by being so close to
M> compiling my first hg patch ;-)
M> Good for me that I just put up the patch for inspection and not pushed
M> it to the repo. Thanks for spotting it and sorry for waisting your
M> time. The real patch is much smaller.
M> Yours
M> --
M> %% Mats
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Patches mailing list
XEmacs-Patches(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-patches