>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen J Turnbull
<stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>>>> "Ben" == Ben Wing <ben(a)xemacs.org>
writes:
Stephen> +--package-prefix=PATH Specify a directory under which packages will
Stephen> + be searched. The directories `xemacs-packages'
and
Stephen> + (if MULE support exists) `mule-packages' (along
with,
Stephen> + optionally, `site-packages') should exist under
this
Stephen> + directory. This is preferred to specifying
Stephen> + `--package-path' directly and is equivalent to
Stephen> + --package-path="~/.xemacs::${package-prefix}/\
Stephen> + site-packages:${package_prefix}/xemacs-packages:\
Stephen> + ${package_prefix}/mule-packages"
Stephen> + (or the same without `.../mule-packages' if no
Stephen> + MULE support exists)
Stephen> As far as I know this is incorrect. ~/.xemacs is not a package
Stephen> hierarchy, it is a package root, and therefore there should be
Stephen> ~/.xemacs/xemacs-packages, etc.
Stephen> Mike?
Yes, I just saw this as well. Also, I don't see a rationale for
this---we need to make path searching simpler, not more complicated.
Stephen> I would also support removing --package-path entirely.
Yes.
As to the mail-locking, listing "mmdf" and "pop" under
"locking" seems
very counter-intuitive to me, especially as pop is redundant with
"with-pop".
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla