Re: [Q] #'featurep byte-optimisation
* Michael Sperber <sperber(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:
Steve Youngs <steve(a)sxemacs.org> writes:
> * Michael Sperber <sperber(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:
>
> > Generally, the change seems fine. But do we really need to use regexps
> > for this kind of thing?
Unfortunately, as Aidan pointed out, the patch was wrong anyway. I've
asked to have it reverted.
I would think a small interpreter for the featurep language is
needed. I'll be happy to write it if it's the right thing to do.
I'm not sure. I'm thinking now that the right thing to do is to leave
featurep as it was prior to me messing with it.
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
| SXEmacs - The only _______ you'll ever need. |
| Fill in the blank, yes, it's THAT good! |
|------------------------------------<steve(a)sxemacs.org>---|
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Patches mailing list
XEmacs-Patches(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-patches
Attachments:
- attachment.sig (application/pgp-signature — 312 bytes)