Re: [Q21.4] type fixes for `lim_data'
>>>> "Andrey" == Andrey Slusar
<anrays(a)gmail.com> writes:
>> My patch is check _RLIM_T_DECLARED, and when it is defined,
>> use the rlim_t type for resource limit data. In Linux this is
>> not defined, lim_data type is unsigned long type. Why this is
>> incorrect?
It's not incorrect, it's merely very bad style to use random
proprocessor symbols in #ifdefs. It's very easy to write the
configure check for it.
Andrey> May by this is a presented in other BSD systems -
Andrey> NetBSD, OpenBSD, DragonflyBSD and other. I am not checked
Andrey> this.
Not a problem on NetBSD 2.0 AFAICS. I'll rebuild and check, though.
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.