Re: Committer workflow

"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org&gt; writes: Do you mean "use the VCS in a non-DAG-oriented manner"? 'Cause Mercurial is a DAG-oriented VCS, and we're using it in a DAG-oriented way. What you describe, if I understand correctly, would create a linear patch history. We could do the exact same thing as "git rebase" with MQ, but it has the problem (that it shares with "git rebase") that it doesn't preserve patch identity. At times of high code churn, these people would have to make sure that they're rebasing faster than everyone else. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Patches mailing list XEmacs-Patches(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-patches