[AC21.5] Comments in configure.ac

APPROVE COMMIT 21.5 I'm pretty sure the comment about XIM being flaky except on Solaris can be removed from 21.4's configure.in, too. If you want a patch, Vin, let me know. Index: ChangeLog =================================================================== RCS file: /pack/xemacscvs/XEmacs/xemacs/ChangeLog,v retrieving revision 1.489 diff -u -r1.489 ChangeLog --- ChangeLog 4 Feb 2006 02:25:47 -0000 1.489 +++ ChangeLog 20 Feb 2006 15:12:29 -0000 ＠＠ -0,0 +1,8 ＠＠ +2006-02-18 Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org&gt; + + * configure.ac (Mule): Mark broken test with ####. + +2006-02-18 Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org&gt; + + * configure.ac (Mule): Remove obsolete comment on XIM. + Index: configure.ac =================================================================== RCS file: /pack/xemacscvs/XEmacs/xemacs/configure.ac,v retrieving revision 1.33 diff -u -r1.33 configure.ac --- configure.ac 4 Feb 2006 02:25:52 -0000 1.33 +++ configure.ac 20 Feb 2006 15:12:30 -0000 ＠＠ -4472,8 +4472,6 ＠＠ AC_CHECKING([for Mule input methods]) dnl Do we have the XmIm* routines? And if so, do we want to use them? - dnl XIM seems to be flaky except on Solaris... - dnl test -z "$with_xim" -a "$opsys" != "sol2" && with_xim=no case "$with_xim" in "" | "yes" ) AC_CHECKING([for XIM]) AC_CHECK_LIB(X11, XOpenIM, with_xim=xlib, with_xim=no) ＠＠ -4481,6 +4479,8 ＠＠ dnl Only use Motif if linking Motif anyway, or don't have xlib XIM if test "$need_motif $have_lesstif" = "yes no"; then AC_CHECK_LIB(Xm, XmImMbLookupString, with_xim=motif) + dnl #### This is always false. + dnl Not clear what we want, although "yes no yes" is insufficient. elif test "$have_motif $have_lesstif $with_xim" = "yes no no"; then AC_CHECK_LIB(Xm, XmImMbLookupString, with_xim=motif) fi ;; -- School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.