Adrian Aichner <adrian(a)xemacs.org> writes:
The following is such a loss of an XEmacs-specific change:
This should have been marked
;; XEmacs change: ...
and not
;; GDF
which is the acronym of a nowadays mostly inactive developer.
Ok, got it. I did not noticed, since yes, it was not tagged as XEmacs.
I ran out of energy here and the rest of your patch is not reviewed.
I hope I'm really helping and not giving more work in reviewing a
patch than doing the sync yourself (as an experienced XEmacs developer).
I guess there should be a checklist of XEmacs-specific changes
to modes somewhere, making anyone easier to Sync.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant