Jérôme Marant <jmarant(a)free.fr> writes:
Adrian Aichner <adrian(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> The following is such a loss of an XEmacs-specific change:
>
> This should have been marked
> ;; XEmacs change: ...
> and not
> ;; GDF
> which is the acronym of a nowadays mostly inactive developer.
Ok, got it. I did not noticed, since yes, it was not tagged as XEmacs.
> I ran out of energy here and the rest of your patch is not reviewed.
I hope I'm really helping and not giving more work in reviewing a
patch than doing the sync yourself (as an experienced XEmacs developer).
Oh, you are helping, Jérôme!
And I was trying to do my part.
Would be great if you could address these minor issues.
I guess there should be a checklist of XEmacs-specific changes
to modes somewhere, making anyone easier to Sync.
Well, what I wrote could be a start.
There have been other explanations in the past emails.
I am not aware of a set of syncing instructions or suggestions.
Are there any?
Best regards,
Adrian
Cheers,
--
Adrian Aichner
mailto:adrian@xemacs.org
http://www.xemacs.org/