Olivier Galibert writes:
Please review (it's hairy code, another pair of eyes is no
luxury) and
apply if happy. It's probably easier in that specific case to check
the result rather than the diff.
A careful review later, but first a cosmetic suggestion: reorder the
functions to go from simpler to more complex, probably
separate_textual_runs_nomule
separate_textual_runs_xft_nomule
separate_textual_runs_xft_mule
separate_textual_runs_mule
+ for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
+ *text_storage++ = str[i];
Did the no-Mule, no-Xft case get *too bald* for you so you had to
introduce some hair?<wink>
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Patches mailing list
XEmacs-Patches(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-patches