Re: commit: Fix specifier inheritance behavior

Didier Verna writes: Could you please explain what this patch does, specifically why the no-fallback behavior is needed wherever it was that you added it? I assume this has something to do with your background image problem; please explain in more general terms than "it does what I need it to do," ie, for either Lispref or Internals (as appropriate). A patch would be nice, but if you don't feel like hacking texi, I can do that part. It doesn't look like you actually fixed specifier inheritance behavior; this option was available all along in specifiers themselves. Rather you added no-fallback behavior to images or something that uses images, right? Did you ever post a patch (besides that auto-commit notice)? I don't recall seeing it, and Vin responded to the commit notice.... What was all the whitespace fiddling doing i nthat patch? _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Patches mailing list XEmacs-Patches(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-patches