[issue] Representing nonterminating binary float results
- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2024 -----
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2004 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2003 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2002 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2001 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2000 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1999 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1998 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
Hey, what a great idea! We should do this too. :-)
I believe that the Python license is sufficient flexible that we can
Steal This Code! if anybody wants to work on it.
P.S. If I set up the subject correctly, this should appear on the
tracker shortly.
Nick Coghlan writes:
On 2 December 2013 11:45, Mark Lawrence
<breamoreboy(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> The newbie says it should be 4.5 but gets 4.499999999999999999999 so raises
> issue on bug tracker stating that Python can't do arithmetic properly.
>
> In [5]: 9/2
> Out[5]: 4.5
>
> Blast, lousy example :)
Getting a modern Python to fall into that trap at all is actually
quite difficult - the way str.__repr__ works was changed a while ago
to favour the nearest terminating approximation that is represented
using the same IEEE754 bit pattern :)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen J Turnbull
<stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Stephen> Hey, what a great idea! We should do this too. :-)
Stephen> I believe that the Python license is sufficient flexible that we can
Stephen> Steal This Code! if anybody wants to work on it.
Stephen> P.S. If I set up the subject correctly, this should appear on the
Stephen> tracker shortly.
FWIW, Dybvig has a paper on printing floats. Dybvig includes a full
scheme implementation in the paper and provides a C implementation as
well. I think the C implementation is missing one of the algorithms
in the paper, however. I think the implementation needs bignum
arithmetic.
Ray
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Raymond Toy <toy.raymond(a)gmail.com> writes:
>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen J Turnbull
<stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Stephen> Hey, what a great idea! We should do this too. :-)
Stephen> I believe that the Python license is sufficient flexible that we can
Stephen> Steal This Code! if anybody wants to work on it.
Stephen> P.S. If I set up the subject correctly, this should appear on the
Stephen> tracker shortly.
FWIW, Dybvig has a paper on printing floats. Dybvig includes a full
scheme implementation in the paper and provides a C implementation as
well. I think the C implementation is missing one of the algorithms
in the paper, however. I think the implementation needs bignum
arithmetic.
No, Bob Burger's algorithm comes with its own, very restricted implementation of
bignum arithmetic. It takes a little work as it only represents the
digits, but otherwise is quite operational.
--
Regards,
Mike
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
3791
days inactive
3792
days old
2 comments
3 participants
tags (0)
participants (3)
-
Michael Sperber -
Raymond Toy -
Stephen J. Turnbull