No I don't think so. My guess is that most packages would need an overhaul. It involves looking at the upstream version of a package and see whether there is something new that we can sync with the version in the package tree. I think there are many reasons to try to stay in sync with packages that are developed actively. It can be that bugs are being fixed there, new functionality is introduced that we would want to have, they are adopted to the changing world, etc. The reason I suggest it as a vehicle for development is that it will among other things help us sort out incompatibilities with GNU Emacs. This will have the positive effect that other packages, packages not in the package tree, packages we have never heard of, are more likely to work with XEmacs. Yours -- %% Mats _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta