Re: Mailing list concerning "unsupported" packages
On Mon, 2002-09-16 at 13:13, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
sjt> I'll cons up a mailing list later this week. Is
sjt> xemacs-unsupported OK for the name? Or maybe xemacs-contrib?
sjt> Suggestions welcome.
Er, I spaced on this. But the general lack of complaint makes me tend
to think it's not needed.
Second opinions?
When/if people start mailing me or xemacs-beta a lot about unsupported
stuff, I'll yell :) I don't think that list is needed at the moment.
--
\/ille Skyttä
ville.skytta at xemacs.org