byte-compiling within lexical-let

Hello, byte-compiling an upward funarg situation within a lexical-let is problematic: (funcall (lexical-let ((a 42)) (lambda () a))) => 42 (funcall (lexical-let ((a 42)) (byte-compile (lambda () a)))) => 42 Okay, modulo a compile-log warning: ** Passing a quoted lambda (arg 1) to #'apply, forcing function quoting After that, there are more contrived situations where it completely stops working, as in cases where you need to partially evaluate the lambda-form: (funcall (lexical-let ((a 42)) (byte-compile (eval '(lambda () a))))) => [bad lexical ref] This is simplified, but think `(lambda () ,foo stuff a). In general, the problem occurs when you can't control the time at which cl-macroexpand-all performs. In such situations, the lexically let symbols translation may miss some cases occuring in already byte-compiled forms. I can't quite figure out a way around this right now. Any ideas ? -- Resistance is futile. You will be jazzimilated. Scientific site: http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier Music (Jazz) site: http://www.didierverna.com _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta