Re: top-level packages repo
Henry S. Thompson wrote:
Mike Kupfer writes:
> Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>
>> As far as I can make sense of things, that's because the top-level
>> repo tip is at 17 May, but gnus itself is at 27 June, when the
>> relevant patch came in.
>
> Yes, that's what I see, too.
>
> Norbert, can you fix the top-level packages repo, please?
Is this related to the following, which I see when I pull and then
update at the top of the xemacs-packages tree:
subrepository sources for xemacs-packages/gnus differ (in checked out version)
use (l)ocal source (45540f5758d2) or (r)emote source (de9ea3b04d44)?
What should I answer?
Yes, this is from fixing the top-level repo and from generating a
package tarball for gnus with the digit-char-p fix. I saw the same
thing when I pulled from Bitbucket.
In this case, you should answer "r". This is because de9ea3b04d44 is
just 45540f5758d2 plus 2 changesets that get automatically generated
when Norbert builds a new package tarball.
$ hg log -G -l 3
＠ changeset: 306:de9ea3b04d44
| tag: tip
| user: Norbert Koch <viteno(a)xemacs.org>
| date: Fri Sep 18 22:22:00 2015 +0200
| summary: Added tag gnus-2_02 for changeset c347d2ce5863
|
o changeset: 305:c347d2ce5863
| tag: gnus-2_02
| user: Norbert Koch <viteno(a)xemacs.org>
| date: Fri Sep 18 22:22:00 2015 +0200
| summary: XEmacs Package Release 2.02
|
o changeset: 304:45540f5758d2
| user: Mike Sperber <sperber(a)deinprogramm.de>
| date: Sat Jun 27 09:08:12 2015 +0200
| summary: Redefine `digit-char-p' only conditionally.
|
$
mike
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta