From vroonhof at math.ethz.ch Sun Feb 26 16:40:24 2017 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7222523432950166154==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Jan Vroonhof To: xemacs-beta at xemacs.org Subject: Re: Use a more modern HTML DTD by default Date: 2000-02-22 19:05:49 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: torkel@hpc2n.umu.se's message of "22 Feb 2000 17:04:48 +0100" --===============7222523432950166154== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable torkel(a)hpc2n.umu.se (Bj?rn Torkelsson) writes: > What are the PC way to comment on patches sent to xemacs-patches if you > are not a member of the review board? xemacs-beta? Yep. Although if you think a patch can cause a thermonuclear reaction it is a good idea to CC xemacs-review (you are allowed to write to it). Most actual discussion should occur here. > Why not using 4.01 then? > = > +(defcustom html-helper-htmldtd-version "\n" I'm all for it. I just copied our site wide settings (which should be updated I guess). Jan --===============7222523432950166154==--