Martin Buchholz <martin(a)xemacs.org&gt; writes: I personally think this is a Good Thing[TM] but didn't we decide not to work around this bug? I remember posting a question about this some time ago (although I hadn't actually tried doing it). If this goes in shouldn't there at least be a comment in the code, otherwise someone might just undo this during the next code fiddling attack :-) Gunnar -- Gunnar Evermann Speech, Vision & Robotics Group Engineering Department Cambridge University