Re: RFC: xemacsweb - XEmacs vs. GNU Emacs

Ben> some time more recently, i rewrote my opinion piece; here it Ben> is. Thanks! Sorry about the misattribution of "pusillanimous." Ben> obviously i am not objective, but i think it's important to Ben> have an "our side" piece to match rms's "their side" piece Ben> that we include. I see your point. Personally, I'd like to bend over backward to give RMS's response prominence. That looks "objective". I like Martin's suggestion. What I would suggest as an implementation is that I move my discussion under "Fear of Forking Considered Harmful" to a separate page, and add links that that page, Ben's op piece, etc, as explicitly personal opinions. -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."