Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> writes:
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes:
> their own obarray and everything. Elisp keywords are just symbols
> beginning with `:'. So why shouldn't an optional argument receive a
> symbol beginning with `:'?
Ok you guys have a point there :-). So what could we do instead?
I can't think of a correct solution to this.
Implement packages so one can call
(xemacs::read-from-minibuffer).
??
Why would you want to do that? Packages are used for clean namespace
separation, e.g. so that Gnus functions don't need to start with
`gnus-'.
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
The end of the world is coming... SAVE YOUR BUFFERS!