Re: packages with binaries
Stephen writes:
BTW, are you really sure you want to do this? Kyle's code was
idiosyncratic (to say the least), but recent VM is a bletcherous mess.
:-(
I think it's becoming less so as Uday fits bits of refactoring into
the frenetic feature addition.
More importantly, it's less buggy. The version currently in our
repository still has mail-corrupting coding system bugs.
(If you think vm is bletcherous, you should see my add-ons;-)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta